Last month, a customer called Peter, co-founder and CEO of Phundit, and he was not happy.
He'd done everything right. Deposited steadily and built up about 13,000 cedis in the app. And for all that discipline, his money was earning him roughly 25 cedis in interest a week. To him, the math was an insult. Thirteen thousand cedis should be working.
Peter's answer wasn't an apology. It was the entire reason Phundit exists.
"For an emergency fund, you are looking for capital preservation," he says. Not aggressive growth. Not the best rate in town. Preservation. The app wasn't underperforming. It was doing exactly the job it was built to do, a job most of its users have never been taught to want.
The instinct Phundit is fighting.
That call is worth sitting with because the customer wasn't confused. He was normal.
Ghana's recent financial memory is a graveyard of promised returns. Menzgold. DKM. The microfinance collapses. A generation watched "guaranteed high interest" become a euphemism for money that never came back, and somehow came out the other side still measuring every cedi by one metric: how fast is it growing? An account that merely holds your money safely feels, to many young savers, like an account that is wasting it.
So the real problem isn't that young people don't save. Plenty do, in susu boxes, in MoMo wallets. The problem is subtler: the belief that all money has the same job, and that job is growth. Ghana doesn't have a savings problem so much as a what-is-this-money-for problem. Money saved without an assignment gets judged on yield alone, and money judged on yield alone eventually ends up somewhere it can be lost.
What Phundit actually does.
Strip away the app store copy, and Phundit does one narrow thing: get young Ghanaians to build an emergency fund before they invest and keep it intact.
You set a target. You deposit regularly. The money sits in a mutual fund with regulated institutions, earning modest interest daily. Users have put away more than 600,000 cedis so far, earmarked for emergencies, not for December.
Then there's the part that looks like decoration and isn't. Consistent savers earn Phundit Coins, redeemable for data, ECG prepaid, and DStv. Short money lessons pay Coins too. Zoe, the in-app AI guide, answers the kind of questions that customers asked Peter on the phone.
Notice what all of that is compensating for. The rewards exist because the returns are not meant to excite you. Phundit won't dangle Menzgold numbers, so it has to make the act of saving itself feel like progress. Boring money needs a different kind of motivation.
Why boring beats brilliant.
An emergency fund has exactly one job: to be there, whole, at 2am. When the car dies on the motorway. When the job disappears. Its entire value is that it shows up, in full, on the worst day of your year.
That job description quietly rules out everything that pays well. Yield is never free; it's compensation for risk or for locking your money away. An emergency fund can afford neither. The 25 cedis a week isn't the product failing. It's the price of certainty.
And the fund isn't in competition with investing; it's what makes investing survivable. Without a cushion, every emergency forces you to liquidate at the worst time or borrow at the worst terms. The boring fund is what lets the ambitious money stay ambitious.
What to take from this.
If you're saving, assign your money jobs first: emergency, goals, growth, then pick the instrument. Your emergency fund is allowed to be dull. If it isn't, something is wrong.
If you're building in fintech, Phundit's hardest problem isn't technical. It's retraining expectations in a market schooled by a decade of Ponzi arithmetic. The real product is that phone conversation, repeated at scale, presumably; that's what Zoe is for.
The customer wanted his money to do more. Phundit's bet is that a generation learns to want the right kind of more. Twenty-five cedis a week never sounded like much, until the day the whole 13,000 is there when you need it.
Watch the episode:
